Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 2023 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243282

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The impact of Covid-19 infection on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes is not fully known. To describe the risk factors and perinatal outcome of pregnant women with suspected COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We evaluated medical records of women with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received health care services at the University Hospital of São Bernardo do Campo from March 1 to July 31, 2020, and personal, clinical, and laboratory data of these women and their newborns. RESULTS: Of the 219 women identified, 29% were asymptomatic. Considering the total population, 26% and 17% had obesity and hypertensive syndrome, respectively. Fever measured in the emergency room was the main reason for hospitalization. The presence or not of flu-like symptoms did not impact on perinatal outcomes. Pregnant women requiring hospitalization had newborns with lower birth weight (p < 0.01), shorter length (p = 0.02), and smaller head circumference (p = 0.03), and, in these cases, a higher number of cesarean section deliveries was observed. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection did not affect the prognosis of pregnancy and newborns. However, the worst clinical outcome, requiring hospitalization, had an impact on the anthropometric measurements of newborns.


What is already known on this subject?The SARS-CoV-2 infection is not fully undestood, specially during pregnancy and puerperae. There are conflicted information about this in the literature so far. However, it is known that respiratory infections such as influenza and SARS can develop unfavorably in pregnant women, since pregnancy changes the women's physiological condition, including altered immunity to tolerate placenta and fetus proper development.What this study adds?COVID-19 did not affect the prognosis of pregnancy and newborns in this study, but, the worst clinical outcome (hospitalization), impacted the anthropometric measurements of newborns.

2.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(4): 737-746, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2209443

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG in the blood and colostrum of women with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and associate the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA in colostrum with clinical symptoms of their newborns. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was developed with 165 participants with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and their newborns. DATA COLLECTED: characteristics COVID-19 infection in pregnant women, gestational age, and clinical symptoms in their newborns (fever, hypothermia, respiratory distress, hypotonia, hypoactivity, hypoglycemia, cyanosis, vomiting/regurgitation, abdominal distention, and jaundice). Maternal blood and colostrum samples were collected postpartum to to detect the presence of IgA and IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: The median interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and delivery was 37.5 days (IQ = 12.0, 73.0 days). Clinical symptoms during hospitalization were observed in 55 newborns (33.3%), and two (1.6%) tested RT-PCR positive for COVID-19. Positive colostrum for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA was found in 117 (70.9%) women. The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA in colostrum was associated independently with lower clinical symptoms in their newborns (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.202 to 0.84; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA in colostrum was detected in more than two-thirds of the women evaluated and was associated with a lower frequency of clinical symptoms in their newborns.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Pregnancy , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19 Testing , Colostrum , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G
4.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(6): e15129, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1416309

ABSTRACT

Pityriasis rosea (PR) has been manifested in patients suffering from COVID-19 as well as after vaccine protocols against SARS-CoV-2. It has a possible association with the HHV-6B virus (roseola infantum) and can be controlled by antivirals such as acyclovir as well as by the amino acid l-Lysine that showed a positive result in reducing the number of lesions and healing time. The aim of this study was to report a case of PR after a second dose of Oxford-AstraZeneca, the adopted therapy and a brief literature review. A 53-year-old woman, phototype II, presented an erythematous lesion in the posterior right thigh 15 days after the second dose of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. Eight days after the initial injury, new injuries appeared in the calf, buttocks and thighs. The diagnosis was PR with a 5-week eruption cycle. The treatment consisted of the use of l-Lysine, 3 grams loading dose and 500 mg for 30 days and moisturizing/healing lotion, starting 14 days after the herald patch. After the 5th week of the disease cycle, there were no new eruptions and the repair cycle continued for up to 8 weeks leaving some residual skin spots. It is concluded that the patient may be a carrier a latent virus, HHV-6, and the vaccine administration with immune system stimulation, would have activated the possible virus causing PR. l-Lysine helped to control the manifestation by limiting the number of lesions and their location, which were restricted to the legs, thighs and buttocks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Herpesvirus 7, Human , Pityriasis Rosea , Vaccines , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pityriasis Rosea/chemically induced , Pityriasis Rosea/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Hum Lact ; 36(4): 609-613, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-799479

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Human milk cannot currently be considered a major source of COVID-19 infection. On the other hand, it can contain specific antibodies that could modulate a possible newborn infection by SARS-CoV-2. MAIN ISSUE: A 32-year-old pregnant woman, gestational age 37 and 3/7 weeks, was admitted with a flu-like syndrome caused by COVID-19. The female newborn was appropriate for gestational age, with a birth weight of 2,890 g, length 48 cm, and head circumference 34 cm. MANAGEMENT: The mother-infant dyad remained in the rooming-in unit during hospitalization, exclusively breastfeeding and following World Health Organization recommendations for contact and airway precautions. On the 3rd day after delivery, two mother's milk samples (3 and 5 mL) were collected by hand expression. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min twice consecutively to separate fat, which was removed, and the remaining material was transferred to another tube to determine anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin A and Immunoglobulin G (ELISA, Kit EUROIMMUN AG, Luebeck, Germany). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin A was detected in the two samples evaluated, whose values were 2.5 and 1.9, respectively. No anti-SARSCoV-2 immunoglobulin G was detected. The exclusively-breastfed infant remained well through 45 days of age. CONCLUSION: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin A in the milk of mothers infected with COVID-19 may be related to protection against the transmission and severity of the disease in their infants.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/metabolism , COVID-19/immunology , Immunoglobulin A/metabolism , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Milk, Human/immunology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , Biomarkers/metabolism , Breast Feeding , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Serological Testing , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL